Skip to main content

Free will and ai personas



Had this inkling of an idea and wanted to try something new. Just have multiple known personalities explain my own idea to me in their own style. Makes the concept surprisingly fun and clear. See for yourself. 

Prompt

We all conscious beings have a unique seat to experience this interactive immersive movie with 5 senses. 

Is there free will? Possibly but much less than we assume. So I think it is practically great framework to assume that no one else has free will but only you do. And that too only to make a transition from one state to another it is not reliable as a motivator for action but it is like a shifting gear to just shift the automaton from one state to another. 

It’s helpful to assume others don’t have that free will in order to channelize our free will to just bother about our automaton because it is really hard to use someone else’s free will to change there behaviour using our free will.  Also this leads to forgiveness and internal locus of control and much relaxed and happier life.

Personalities

Adele:

"Remote Controls"

Verse 1:

Been trying to change you, for all these years

Pushing and pulling, through all my tears

Thought I could fix you, thought I could make you see

But baby, I finally understand, we're all just running on autopilot, free


Chorus:

We're all just passengers, in this grand design

Each with our stories, playing out in time

I can't control your remote, only mine

And that's when I found peace, oh, that's when I found peace

In letting go of what isn't mine


Verse 2:

Your morning lateness, my constant rage

Your stubborn habits, my turning page

Then like the sunrise, it hit me clear as day

We're all just dancing to rhythms written yesterday


(Chorus repeats)


Bridge:

(Building intensity)

And now I see you clearer than before

Not broken pieces I need to restore

Just human being, doing what you do

And I'm finally free, free to focus on my truth


Final Chorus:

(Softening)

We're all just passengers, in this grand design

Each with our stories, playing out in time

I can't control your remote, only mine

And that's when I found peace, oh, that's when I found peace

In letting go... of what isn't mine


Outro:

(Whispered)

Just let it go... what isn't mine

Taylor swift:

"Autopilot Hearts"


Verse 1:

Friday night, trying to make you see

Why you're always running late when you meet me

Three years of frustration boiling inside

Then it hit me walking down 5th at midnight


Pre-Chorus:

I've been playing God with a broken remote

Trying to rewrite your code

But baby, that's not how this story goes


Chorus:

'Cause we're all just running on autopilot

Pre-programmed hearts in a world so quiet

I finally found the truth at 2 AM

Stopped trying to change your frequency

Now I'm dancing with my own electricity

Yeah, I found peace when I set you free

(Set you free)


Verse 2:

Your mom taught you to speak your mind

That's why you interrupt me all the time

Used to make me mad, now I understand

We're all just playing the cards in our hands


(Pre-Chorus repeats)


(Chorus repeats)


Bridge:

(Spoken-rap style)

Maybe Shakespeare was wrong about the world being a stage

'Cause we're not actors, we're more like automated plays

Running on scripts written long ago

And the only remote control I get to hold

Is my own, is my own, is my own...

(Building up)

And that's the plot twist nobody tells you about growing up!


Final Chorus:

(With layered vocals)

Now we're all just running on autopilot

Pre-programmed hearts but I'm finally quiet

Found the truth at 2 AM

Stopped trying to change your frequency

Now I'm dancing with my own electricity

Yeah, I found peace when I set you free

When I set you free

When I set us free


Outro:

(Soft, with electronic beats fading)

Now I only press buttons on my own remote

That's how this story finally goes...

Donald trump 

"Folks, let me tell you something, and I know a lot about people, believe me. We have these incredible minds, tremendous minds, and we're all watching this amazing show called life. It's like a 4D movie, the best movie you've ever seen, absolutely fantastic.

Now, people come up to me and they say 'Sir, why can't I change other people?' And I tell them - and this is very important - you can't! You just can't. It's like trying to drive somebody else's beautiful Trump car from your own car - impossible, folks, impossible.

Look, we all have this thing called free will, but let me tell you, it's not what the fake philosophers want you to believe. It's very limited, very limited. I know it, you know it, everybody knows it. And the smart people, the really smart people, they focus on their own remote control - that's it!

And when you do that - and trust me, I've built an amazing empire doing just that - when you do that, you become so successful, so peaceful. Your life becomes tremendous. The radical left won't tell you this, but it's true. Stop trying to change others - total waste of time, total waste. Focus on yourself, and you'll win so much, you'll get tired of winning!"

Elon Musk's technical, first-principles style:

"So if you think about it from first principles, consciousness is effectively a rendering engine processing multiple sensory inputs simultaneously. Each consciousness instance is running its own unique client, fascinating when you think about it.

The free will problem is actually a classical deterministic system with quantum uncertainty variables. Let me explain with a software analogy:

Imagine everyone is running legacy code they didn't write:

- Early childhood experiences = base code

- Cultural conditioning = operating system

- Genetic predispositions = hardware architecture 

The key insight that took me years to figure out is that trying to modify someone else's source code remotely is exponentially more complex than updating your own local instance. It's fundamentally a bandwidth and permissions problem.

Our practical solution is to treat it like a distributed system where you only have admin access to your own node. This creates:

1. Optimal resource allocation

2. Reduced entropy in social interactions

3. Higher psychological homeostasis

4. ~42% improvement in life satisfaction metrics

We're actually running some interesting simulations on this at Neuralink. *awkward laugh*

Pretty obvious in hindsight, but this insight literally improved my system efficiency by an order of magnitude. Critics might disagree, but the data is quite clear on this."


Here's the concept in Ryan Holiday's stoic, historical-reference-rich style:

"In 145 AD, Marcus Aurelius wrote about accepting what was beyond his control - even as an emperor of Rome. Today, we face the same fundamental truth, just in a different arena.

Consider this: You're given a front-row seat to the greatest show on Earth - consciousness itself. But like the ancient Stoics taught us, we often waste this gift by trying to control the uncontrollable.

I'm reminded of the story of Cato, who could maintain tranquility even as Rome burned around him. Why? Because he understood what modern psychology is only now confirming: our power lies not in controlling others, but in directing our own will.

Think of it like this: Everyone you meet is running ancient software, programmed by their experiences, their trauma, their triumphs. Your colleague who never meets deadlines? That's their programming. Your friend who always interrupts? Their code at work.

The obstacle is the way: Once you accept that you can only modify your own programming, you've found the path to tranquility. This isn't just philosophy - it's practical wisdom that transforms lives.

Remember: Ego is the enemy of this understanding. The more we think we can control others, the more we suffer.

Here's Hemingway's terse, direct style:

"The man sat at the cafe and watched people pass. Each one moved like a train on its tracks. Fixed. Determined. He had spent years trying to change them. It was all bull. 

You get one control panel. Yours. That is all. The rest is like trying to stop the rain.

He drank his wine and knew this was true. The knowing made him feel clean and good. The sun was setting. Tomorrow would be a better day because he would only try to drive his own car. That was enough.


And Jordan Peterson's intense, psychological style:

"Look, it's like this - and this is absolutely crucial to understand: We're all functioning in this unimaginably complex hierarchy of being, each consciousness experiencing its own phenomenological reality. And that's no bloody joke!

But here's the thing - and I've seen this countless times in my clinical practice - people are constantly trying to exert their will over others' behavioral patterns. And that's absolute chaos, man! It's like... *long pause, eyes welling up* it's like trying to reorganize someone else's room when you can barely keep your own room clean!

The fundamental archetypal truth - and this is straight from Jung's work on the collective unconscious - is that we each have our own internal regulatory system, shaped by millions of years of evolution. And the probability that you can meaningfully intervene in someone else's evolutionary programming? That's virtually zero, bucko!

So what's the solution? *straightens posture* First, clean your room. Then, understand that your free will is like a precious resource - roughly speaking, it's a tool for modifying your own behavioral patterns, not others'. And that's deeply meaningful!

The dragon of chaos in our lives often comes from trying to control other people's autonomic responses. The antidote is to focus on your own sovereignty. And that's no naive optimism - that's contending with the fundamental structure of reality itself!

And that's that."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ' What if ? ' illusion

As humans, our mere ability to think 'What if?' makes us believe that we are in control. But do we really change things, do we affect the reality. If we do , to what degree? It is said that if a butterfly makes an extra flap of its wings, the reality can change so much so that after a decade a nonexistent cyclone can result.Is it really true? Even if it is, does the butterfly really have a control enough to make that extra flap? Is it really free will or an illusion of free will? A very fascinating example is seen in first person games like Prince of Persia or God of wars and so on.The game makers try hard to give the gamers a feeling that they can do anything in that virtual world. The game programmers know very well though that they can program only a limited number of options. There cannot be more than a finite number of stimulus- response pairs that they would have programmed. Even then, while we play the game we feel that we are in complete control (at least that is the ai...

TED

The following are the answers that I wrote for the Ted fellowship form. I write them here because they provided me with wonderful insight Tell us about yourself We take this portion of the application very seriously. Please take the time to answer the questions thoughtfully, with enough detail to help us understand who you are. All responses are limited to 1500 characters except where noted. If a friend were to describe your accomplishments in up to three sentences, what would he or she say? * Tejesh, who has got dozens of different pet names owing to his social circles, has his biggest achievement as cracking IIT JEE which is the world's toughest entrance exam. He cracked it big time by being 147th out of 3 hundred thousand people that appeared. He has a powerful analytical mind, which is evident from his affinity to solving puzzles and his ability to think freely.He has an addiction for outings and knows the mountains and forests of India alike. What other achievements (not only ...

IIM Ahmedabad interview

14th March 2010, IIFT Delhi Morning 8:45 exactly around 28 call getters were divided into 4 panels .Then we were called in for writing our essays. In ten minutes we were supposed to write an essay on "Is banning politicians with criminal records from contesting election violation of their rights?". At first I felt it was a bouncer, so I only had two choices, either duck down and give up or hook. I could not have played a defensive shot. It was a bouncer because I had to be sure that I don't mention any random political proper nouns in the essay which i could be questioned upon later in the interview. so very carefully i put forward two points, in a fairly structured way. Firstly, that in india politicians are looked upon as leaders, and there is a need of immaculate integrity at the top.Secondly, if thousands of citizens' rights are at stake, we can forgo a chance of violating one politician's rights and if he is a true servant, he won't mind it. I thoug...