-------->

<--------

<--------

--------->

<--------

--------->

--------->

<--------

<--------

--------->

--------->

<--------

-------->

<--------

<--------

--------->

and so on...

now think of it as ...

two boys A and B...

A standing to left and B standing to right..

as the first arrow is L to R, it implies first i give a fruit to A and then to B.

now B says "this is not fair and so now perform a second event i.e. a second arrow from me(B) to A" .. now we think that it is balanced but B doesn't think so .. he says the first arrow was L to R and the second one was R to L. but now i want the first arrow to be from R to L and the second from L to R...ok done!

but now B again says the pattern of first 4 arrows somehow favours A because it still starts with L to R.....so a pattern of 8 results...but still B is complaining and so a pattern of 16 then 32

and so on results...

i agree ab tak to faltoooo tha ,but the main thing about the pattern is what are the various points i jotted down..

they are...

<--------

<--------

--------->

<--------

--------->

--------->

<--------

<--------

--------->

--------->

<--------

-------->

<--------

<--------

--------->

and so on...

now think of it as ...

two boys A and B...

A standing to left and B standing to right..

as the first arrow is L to R, it implies first i give a fruit to A and then to B.

now B says "this is not fair and so now perform a second event i.e. a second arrow from me(B) to A" .. now we think that it is balanced but B doesn't think so .. he says the first arrow was L to R and the second one was R to L. but now i want the first arrow to be from R to L and the second from L to R...ok done!

but now B again says the pattern of first 4 arrows somehow favours A because it still starts with L to R.....so a pattern of 8 results...but still B is complaining and so a pattern of 16 then 32

and so on results...

i agree ab tak to faltoooo tha ,but the main thing about the pattern is what are the various points i jotted down..

they are...

- the patterns can be of only two types either A to B or B to A (if we don't consider a third boy C , otherwise it becomes very complex)
- so if we change the first arrow all arrows need to be changed the second pattern being the exact mirror image of the first...
- introducing any arrow in between the pattern spoils the pattern..
- considering this demanding nature of B 'B will only be satisfied at infinity'..
- it is like by marking the first arrow we give A an advantage of '1' .then if we move to a two arrow system we give B an advantage of '1/2' ,which is still less than 1 and he asks for more so we move to a 2 raised to the power nth system and give B an advantage of '1/2 raised to the power n'. now summing all the advantages of B, if finite steps are taken it is still less than 1., but in infinite steps it becomes = 1 . so in a L to R system A always has an advantage..
- in which arrow will this system end?? a 2 raised to the power nth system ends in # L to R arrow if n is even # R to L arrow if n is odd. so now we can ask is infinity even or odd (think of infinity in other way as the arrow at which B is satisfied, otherwise 5th point becomes senseless with a mere statement " B is never satisfied " and the world continues forever!!!).
- then we can say that once on this earth an imbalance is created , itis an infinite step process to bring back a balance, each step though reduces our ability to tell or say measure the imbalance
- one more thing I noticed that this pattern is nothing but a fractal .
- now regarding time travel.. I myself believe that traveling to past is not possible because if we could do it ..even if any one of us then by now we would have seen someone from the future but if there is some loop hole in this reasoning and if at all it is possible to move to the past …..then, and if it is somehow related to this pattern then we can move from one time to a particular or say a set of particular times and time intervals only.. why ? lets consider the pattern as a road on which we are walking ..or say we are taught to walk on by our experience , with other people andnature around..this road is the measure of our learning level which changes not only with time but also according to our learning level..thus every individual walks on a different road…pattern…now we are able to go to only that time in the past where the road is accordingly made or on which we can walk (i.e. we can live comfortably, of course not literally.).now in my pattern what I see is that it repeats itself at irregular intervals by irregular steps..so if we can know where and how much does the pattern repeat we can know our accessibility in past .. of course it will never be 100 %...
- concerning human human interaction …each human by his /her experience assigns (unknowingly) a +ve value to one of the two patterns. And the other one is of course –ve…when two people meet each one is carrying his own pattern and each one observes the pattern of the other and judges his nature on its basis….more resonance more friendly.. also the probability which pattern is assigned a +ve value must be half.. now if this is not what actually happens in humans can we create artificial intelligence using this???
- rate of change of pattern for an individual is directly proportional to the rate at which he works i.e. the rate of hisactions and amount of his actions and rate of his gathering experience and rate of his being affected by others NOT the rate at which he affects them …so the more we work( in the above sense) the closer we reach to balance which in its sense may be the final goal of human kind …here things like "karmanye vadhikarasye…" fit superbly don't they ? so act more to achieve maximum balance….

## No comments:

Post a Comment